except it doesn't. if that were true, then fifty shades of grey would actually be a good book
you can like a book that is not written well. i love books that are full of promise that wasnt pulled off because it shows that the author had an idea, and might have even better ones in the future. a book can be bad and still be liked.
Why does anyone get to define that though when it's art?
-_- Are you trying to tell us that there's no such thing as a "bad book" and that books can't have glaringly bad things because it's "aRT"
Why should things be good or bad based on anything except if people like them?
Oh my God. Oh wow. Oh wow. Things can be fucking bad. You need to go work that out. Seriously. Things. Can. Be. Bad.
except it doesn't. if that were true, then fifty shades of grey would actually be a good book
you can like a book that is not written well. i love books that are full of promise that wasnt pulled off because it shows that the author had an idea, and might have even better ones in the future. a book can be bad and still be liked.
Why does anyone get to define that though when it's art?
-_- Are you trying to tell us that there's no such thing as a "bad book" and that books can't have glaringly bad things because it's "aRT"
Why should things be good or bad based on anything except if people like them?
Oh my God. Oh wow. Oh wow. Things can be fucking bad. You need to go work that out. Seriously. Things. Can. Be. Bad.
Okay why is this worth yelling at me about. Agree to disagree. I think if a lot of people like something that makes it good.
you know what, i actually like that idea, random stranger
because i'm kind of fed up with the refusal to acknowledge flaws in literature, with the constant proclaiming of everyone being hypocrites and brick walls despite refusing to listen to anyone else, and the claims of being attacked when literally all anyone did was disagree
so uh, have fun you guys, pickle please cease for your own mental sanity too
except it doesn't. if that were true, then fifty shades of grey would actually be a good book
you can like a book that is not written well. i love books that are full of promise that wasnt pulled off because it shows that the author had an idea, and might have even better ones in the future. a book can be bad and still be liked.
Why does anyone get to define that though when it's art?
-_- Are you trying to tell us that there's no such thing as a "bad book" and that books can't have glaringly bad things because it's "aRT"
Why should things be good or bad based on anything except if people like them?
Oh my God. Oh wow. Oh wow. Things can be fucking bad. You need to go work that out. Seriously. Things. Can. Be. Bad.
Okay why is this worth yelling at me about. Agree to disagree. I think if a lot of people like something that makes it good.
not necessarily
here's a concept: opinions exist
Just because you think it's good doesn't make it good to other people
except it doesn't. if that were true, then fifty shades of grey would actually be a good book
you can like a book that is not written well. i love books that are full of promise that wasnt pulled off because it shows that the author had an idea, and might have even better ones in the future. a book can be bad and still be liked.
Why does anyone get to define that though when it's art?
-_- Are you trying to tell us that there's no such thing as a "bad book" and that books can't have glaringly bad things because it's "aRT"
Why should things be good or bad based on anything except if people like them?
Oh my God. Oh wow. Oh wow. Things can be fucking bad. You need to go work that out. Seriously. Things. Can. Be. Bad.
Okay why is this worth yelling at me about. Agree to disagree. I think if a lot of people like something that makes it good.
People liking serial killers makes them good? Y'ALL, GO REVIVE TED BUNDY, PEOPLE THOUGHT HE WAS ATTRACTIVE AND NICE
People liking something doesn't make it good. How many times do we have to say that for you to fucking get it already???
except it doesn't. if that were true, then fifty shades of grey would actually be a good book
you can like a book that is not written well. i love books that are full of promise that wasnt pulled off because it shows that the author had an idea, and might have even better ones in the future. a book can be bad and still be liked.
Why does anyone get to define that though when it's art?
-_- Are you trying to tell us that there's no such thing as a "bad book" and that books can't have glaringly bad things because it's "aRT"
Why should things be good or bad based on anything except if people like them?
Oh my God. Oh wow. Oh wow. Things can be fucking bad. You need to go work that out. Seriously. Things. Can. Be. Bad.
Okay why is this worth yelling at me about. Agree to disagree. I think if a lot of people like something that makes it good.
not necessarily
here's a concept: opinions exist
Just because you think it's good doesn't make it good to other people
Yes OPINIONS EXIST. Just because you think it's bad, doesn't make it bad to other people?
pickle please cease for your own mental sanity too
I'm trying but it's going pretty poorly
except it doesn't. if that were true, then fifty shades of grey would actually be a good book
you can like a book that is not written well. i love books that are full of promise that wasnt pulled off because it shows that the author had an idea, and might have even better ones in the future. a book can be bad and still be liked.
Why does anyone get to define that though when it's art?
-_- Are you trying to tell us that there's no such thing as a "bad book" and that books can't have glaringly bad things because it's "aRT"
Why should things be good or bad based on anything except if people like them?
Oh my God. Oh wow. Oh wow. Things can be fucking bad. You need to go work that out. Seriously. Things. Can. Be. Bad.
Okay why is this worth yelling at me about. Agree to disagree. I think if a lot of people like something that makes it good.
one last thing i swear
people liked hitler!! so because people liked him, and ghandi and stalin and reagan that means they weren't bad!!!!
except it doesn't. if that were true, then fifty shades of grey would actually be a good book
you can like a book that is not written well. i love books that are full of promise that wasnt pulled off because it shows that the author had an idea, and might have even better ones in the future. a book can be bad and still be liked.
Why does anyone get to define that though when it's art?
-_- Are you trying to tell us that there's no such thing as a "bad book" and that books can't have glaringly bad things because it's "aRT"
Why should things be good or bad based on anything except if people like them?
Oh my God. Oh wow. Oh wow. Things can be fucking bad. You need to go work that out. Seriously. Things. Can. Be. Bad.
Okay why is this worth yelling at me about. Agree to disagree. I think if a lot of people like something that makes it good.
one last thing i swear
people liked hitler!! so because people liked him, and ghandi and stalin and reagan that means they weren't bad!!!!
THOSE WERE REAL PEOPLE. NOT FICTITIOUS BOOKS.
books are real but go off ig
I hate the idea of the Candor test, I have so many things that I don't want people knowing, you know?
Yeah. I am terrified of getting drunk for this reason. I already have a hard time keeping control.
spooky scary Erudites
And shivers down your spine
woah I missed like 11 pages what happened
this is what I get for being social for a day
books are real but go off ig
Yes but they don't contain real people? They contain events that didn't happen so how good they are is just based on if you like events. Meanwhile real serial killers and dictators killed actual people so it's not up for debate that it's bad. Are you seriously comparing me liking Divergent to me liking Hitler? Because that's honestly f*cked up.
woah I missed like 11 pages what happened
this is what I get for being social for a day
don't ask, go back to where you came from, it's not worth it
books are real but go off ig
Yes but they don't contain real people? They contain events that didn't happen so how good they are is just based on if you like events. Meanwhile real serial killers and dictators killed actual people so it's not up for debate that it's bad. Are you seriously comparing me liking Divergent to me liking Hitler? Because that's honestly f*cked up.
Books have real life consequences :/ but maybe you'd need to see that your own, real life, actions have consequences before we move on to something complicated like the obvious affects of fiction.
woah I missed like 11 pages what happened
this is what I get for being social for a day
Someone can explain it in HvF, reading through isn't worth it, especially the recent stuff
books are real but go off ig
Yes but they don't contain real people? They contain events that didn't happen so how good they are is just based on if you like events. Meanwhile real serial killers and dictators killed actual people so it's not up for debate that it's bad. Are you seriously comparing me liking Divergent to me liking Hitler? Because that's honestly f*cked up.
Books have real life consequences :/ but maybe you'd need to see that your own, real life, actions have consequences before we move on to something complicated like the obvious affects of fiction.
Yes but not the way real people do? Harry Potter is not the same as Hitler that's so messed up to even say.
Star Wars and Star Trek is fictious and yet they've impacted the way we see space and advanced technology……………………………………………………………………..
I'm done
It's like arguing with a fuckin circus mirror
I'm done
It's like arguing with a fuckin circus mirror
No it's like arguing with someone who thinks comparing fiction to Hitler isn't ok even if it has an impact on reality.
Star Wars and Star Trek is fictious and yet they've impacted the way we see space and advanced technology……………………………………………………………………..
They literally refer to parts of the Space Race as "Star Wars"
I try to say anything, I get misunderstood, I defend myself, people think I'm attacking them. Nothing can ever go right for me.
I'm done
It's like arguing with a fuckin circus mirror
No it's like arguing with someone who thinks comparing fiction to Hitler isn't ok even if it has an impact on reality.
eat your heart out
the conflict in harry potter directly mirrored hitler and his persecution of jews and people who hid, supported, and allied with them. comparing voldemort to hitler is well within reasonable
