(All of them, as opposed to lust which is interested mainly in one thing or that single thing. Or as opposed to those that chase the feeling and don't do anything to break the glorious "being in love emotion".)
(Dom I just want you to know that my immediate thought was 'have you e'er felt a sudden lust for soup?)
If everyone in the relationship knows about and is chill with everyone else, then I don't really care, you do you. But when the others involved are kept in the dark so one person can have multiple partners at the same time, I'm not cool with that.
If everyone in the relationship knows about and is chill with everyone else, then I don't really care, you do you. But when the others involved are kept in the dark so one person can have multiple partners at the same time, I'm not cool with that.
After reading through the great points brought up by everyone, I'm going to have to say same here, but also extended to that FLDS church Owen talked about. Definitely not cool with that shiz.
If everyone in the relationship knows about and is chill with everyone else, then I don't really care, you do you. But when the others involved are kept in the dark so one person can have multiple partners at the same time, I'm not cool with that.
Same, but also extended to that FLDS church Owen talked about. Definitely not cool with that shiz.
Yeah, that shit's not gonna fly with me.
(All of them, as opposed to lust which is interested mainly in one thing or that single thing. Or as opposed to those that chase the feeling and don't do anything to break the glorious "being in love emotion".)
(Dom I just want you to know that my immediate thought was 'have you e'er felt a sudden lust for soup?)
How odd.
If everyone in the relationship knows about and is chill with everyone else, then I don't really care, you do you. But when the others involved are kept in the dark so one person can have multiple partners at the same time, I'm not cool with that.
Same, but also extended to that FLDS church Owen talked about. Definitely not cool with that shiz.
Yeah, that shit's not gonna fly with me.
Well yeah but those aren't healthy (or even really correct) versions of polyamory. Actual polyamory is healthy and consenting
Okay, normally I stalk, but I've got a think it two to say about polyamory.
I, myself, am polyamorous. However, I only have one boyfriend and I plan on keeping it that way because, from they way he has acted, he is not poly. I love this man, and we have worked to have a good relationship, and I'm not going to force him into anything he doesn't want.
Everything comes down to consent. I myself would never take on another partner without consent from any and all current partners, simply to make sure everyone can get along. In a polyamorous relationship, you cannot just claim to be in love with someone and take them as a partner without the approval of others, because this breeds jealously. Hell, jealously will be able to show up even if everyone does agree to the new partner. The key to a healthy polyamorous relationship is open communication, just like any other. You must communicate how you feel, and allow the group to help you with what is happening.
Yes, many claim polyamory to try to get away with cheating. However, it is still technically cheating if you do not discuss with your current partner taking up another or even just telling them. I know this is not a lifestyle for everyone, and I think it disgusting that people try to force it on others. If you really love someone, you'll respect their decisions, even if you don't like it.
So, yeah. I'm sorry if it's not really cohesive, I'm just spitting out words now.
I still don't believe someone can equally romantically love someone. Man cannot serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other.
Anyone heard the news? Who's in support of slapping camera's on our cops?
What news?
I have not, because you people are currently my only connection to the world outside my house
Can't get into it, because I'm not subscribed to WP, but I did see something about that guy this morning. I see no reason why officers shouldn't wear body cams.
I’m not big on them going and setting smaller businesses, aka things not target on fire and whatnot because those businesses will either take a long time to recover or just wont at all. Plus there was an autozone on fire and auto zones have chemicals in them…. chemicals + fire ain’t good mix
I think they fired the police officers involved with George Floyd’s murder, but honestly the officers involved or at least the one responsible for the killing should’ve received a murder charge for that.
And to add on at least one person has been killed as of result of the violent protests. It’s okay to protest, but once people start dying something isn’t right
I’m also Canadian so I know the law issues are pretty different compare to the states (we still have the same sort of discrimination that happens of course, it’s just not as heard about often and completely different situations and whatnot)
I’m curious on why the police officers used excessive force since the footage I’ve seen shows George Floyd NOT resisting arrest, so….
personally see no problem with it (the body cams) it does allow us to see a different perspective in situations like these to help come to a conclusion
Can't get into it, because I'm not subscribed to WP, but I did see something about that guy this morning. I see no reason why officers shouldn't wear body cams.
I think every news service is following it. https://www.npr.org/2020/05/28/863630502/investigation-into-george-floyds-death-a-top-priority-for-justice-department
Thanks Emi!
Those protests are evidently doing more harm than good. Stopping police brutality doesn't start with asking for it. Those protests are just putting more and more people in danger, drawing the attention of police who perhaps feel justified in practicing violence when they see these types of protests. It's not good for anybody.
Body cams on cops is a good idea, and I don't really see why it hasn't been done already. It's an easy way to get an unbiased look at the story.
they do it in germany and it works well
I'm friends with a family over there where the dad is a cop
he's talked about it and they seem to be useful
cause frens wanted this debate out of another chat
ahem
Idk if we can debate it here because of it's closeness to abortion.
but it's not whether abortion is good or not that's being debated
in this case we'll just assume it's bad to resonate with the majority of anti-vaxxers
it's whether vaccines are good or not that we're actually arguing here
and i say they're good
my opinion that i don’t feel up to defending rn but I’m on its side
my opinion that i don’t feel up to defending rn but I’m on its side
vaccine good
my opinion that i don’t feel up to defending rn but I’m on its side
vaccine good
Seconded, I'm not feeling debatey rn but
I'd be surprised if anyone takes the opposing stance.