So this isn't really a debate but I'm curious to see what you guys have to say.
do you think asexuality should be considered part of LGBT+? Is it already (I actually don't know)? Sweet petunias this is going to be boring, oops. Do you think anti LGBT people consider it any less/more wrong than being gay? Should they?
and anything else you have to say about it
It's definitely part of the community, and it already is.
With the last part, I don't think we can decide who's "right" and who's "wrong." Everyone has a bias when it comes to sexuality, whether we admit it or not.
Personally, I think people are allowed to do what (and who) they want. It is their life and it is their decision
Okay, I thought so, but I saw a thing somewhere about a debate about it, and I was kind of confused but it could've been pretty old. I'm not really up to date on this stuff shrugs
the only two legit invalid sexualities are MAPs(pedophiles) and those guys who think rabies is sexy
faxs
*and also zoophiles
*and furries
*and furries
*and also zoophiles
Ain't these the same thing?
one likes to dress up then fuck another human like that
zoophiles are people who are just attracted to animals
jesus christ
the only two legit invalid sexualities are MAPs(pedophiles) and those guys who think rabies is sexy
Did you watch Strangeaeons' video on the rabies thing?
…..i possibly saw it a while ago. but also, i was on tumblr for years man. i saw so much shit i need to go live in a church for three years despite being pagan
My pinterest is mostly old tumblr posts so that would explain a lot
You know what I'd like to be rude to my sixth grade language arts teacher because she said we had to pick a favorite poem and memorize it to say it in front of the whole class. Everyone was picking really short ones but I memorized the entirety of Constance Contraire's poem about green plaid and the day we were supposed to share, I wore a green plaid skirt. We never shared. I was very upset. It's been five years and I haven't forgotten
Not the Mysterious Benedict Society
Unpopular opinion: there actually are a lot of genders and sexualities that really aren't genders/sexualities
And no, I'm not going to go on a rant about how "pansexuals are just bi people who want to look special" because that's not at all what I'm talking about nor is that true
I'm talking about the Tumblr ones that are actually just personalities
…..i possibly saw it a while ago. but also, i was on tumblr for years man. i saw so much shit i need to go live in a church for three years despite being pagan
She did a sequel to it with its re-emergence back in July, iirc!
Not the Mysterious Benedict Society
Yes. I thought Constance was THE SHIT
Demisexual
That's one I have to criticize
"A demisexual is a person who does not experience sexual attraction unless they form a strong emotional connection with someone."
not necessarily
Well there's a difference between being sexually attracted to someone and acting on those sexual attractions.
Maybe it's just something I'll never understand, but it seems like a very stupid thing to make into a sexuality
i don't completely understand how everything works, so correct me if i'm wrong BUT
isn't it like you aren't really attracted to anyone except a specific person or person(s), due to a connection with them?
It's just an odd specification.