forum Debate. Debate. Debate.

Started March 14, 2019 by Deleted user

tune

Edit topic

She's right, I am

Oh no, how could I hath not knoweth before

Fangirl squeal

BREAKING NEWS: It has been confirmed that I, indeed, am a lamppost

Nah.

I call fake news.

Spoiler - click to show.

Report Confirmed: Pewdiepie and Jacksepticeye had an "Intense sexual relationship".

Did….did you even read the actual interview, or did you just want to drag J.K. Rowling? That's not what she said about Grindelwald and Dumbledore, she actually said the relationship was intense, and when asked about the sexual side of it, she didn't confirm or deny it.

Kind of dragging. Don't get me wrong, Rowling is awesome. But the thing with Dumbledore is such a meme.

I guess I never got pissed about the Dumbledore thing because he's a teacher and generally teachers don't discuss their relationships with their students, especially since HP takes place in the late 80s/early 90s, so being an openly gay wizard teacher most likely wasn't very safe.
Also if I had fallen for the OG dark lord, I wouldn't want my student to know.

That's….so true though?

Jyn or myself?

Dumbledore is kind of a sack of shit and it's more confirmed now with how he treats Newt in the Fantastic Beast movies.
He manipulates everyone around him like chess pieces.

Jyn or myself?

What Jynnie said. She's completely right.

Meh. I only take the seven as cannon. I hated Cursed Child and stopped there.

Jyn or myself?

What Jynnie said. She's completely right.

It is a fair point.

Meh. I only take the seven as cannon. I hated Cursed Child and stopped there.

You can't ignore Fantastic Beasts! Rowling wrote them. They're canon!

Well I also ignore Magnus Chase so that tells you where I am. I am far more invested in the work than the author.

I call fake news.

I call fake news.

L.O.L.

Spoiler - click to show.

He literally raised Harry like a pig for slaughter. It was his plan all along to have this little boy die. That shouldn't be acceptable.
He also knew Harry was in an abusive home. I don't care if its to save the entire world, there is never a good reason to keep a child in an abusive home, let alone knowingly put him in one.
In my opinion, the events that transpired in the first book were a test for Harry. What other reason would Dumbledore have to keep such an important artifact that Voldemort would definitely want, should he hear word of it, at Hogwarts? This isn't a rhetorical question, I don't actually remember if there was a legitimate "reason". It literally showed up at Hogwarts around the exact same time Harry showed up at Hogwarts? Why not keep it at Gringotts? Supposedly, it was safer at Hogwarts, but three 11-year-olds were able to get to something that was meant to keep out the most dangerous wizard of the time. Unless of course, it was a test set up by Dumbledore.

Meh. I only take the seven as cannon. I hated Cursed Child and stopped there.

You can't ignore Fantastic Beasts! Rowling wrote them. They're canon!

Also Fantastic Beasts is amazing and I will defend it until the day I die. Those films got me into writing, they gave me a hero LIKE ME to look up to (unlike so many other films) with an autistic lead who wasn't a 2D stereotype and is basically the male character that everyone needs in today's world, and quite literally saved my life.

Jyn or myself?

What Jynnie said. She's completely right.

Thanks!