A body is a body. I don't really think that any of it should be censored.

Do you think nudists should be allowed to roam the public area?

shrug

It's not my business. I really don't care. I'm not moved by a body in any way really.

I dont sexualize people the second I see them.

<.<

Oh tea

shrug

It's not my business. I really don't care. I'm not moved by a body in any way really.

I care but sips tea ^

I dont sexualize people the second I see them.

<.<

Whoa we got some Big Letters.

I support shooty boy that’s getting all the hate.

I don’t know much about the story at all but didn’t someone try to throw a brick at his head

It was possibly a brick, possibly an explosive, possibly something less harmful. Whatever the case, it wasn’t harmless.

?????

Look up protestor shooter.

I support shooty boy that’s getting all the hate.

Hold up the one in Kenosha?
Who killed protestors?

The dude Kyle? Yeah. I mean, it’s not the cleanest case, what with him holding that gun at 17, but the shooting was in defense of property (of a place he worked iirc) and his life.

Shooty-boy gets my support 100%. Imo he had the right to defend the property as he was, but he certainly had every right to defend his own life. Any pack of protesters willing to attack a 17 year old boy and try to kill him are kinda asking for it. Plus he had a gun, so they knew the risks when they bothered going after him. I mean, I'm not gonna lie; if I were in his shoes, attacked by a group of people trying to physically harm me (especially kill me), and I had a weapon to defend myself, you had better bet I'm gonna use it.

^^^
this

… He killed two people, shot another, had an AR-15 that he definitely wasn't allowed to have, and wasn't even in his state at the time.

And the prostestors only started trying to take his gun from him (not attack him, take his rifle) after he shot someone in the head.

Where are you guys getting your information??

I'm wondering the same thing about where you're getting yours. Which, to be perfectly honest, I'm not really going to blame any person specifically about what they think happened in the situation or expect them to agree with me since most of the information we get (from all media outlets; CNN, FOX, or the vast majority of articles you read on the internet) are all twisted to fit whatever narrative is currently being pushed. We're all being lied to constantly, whether anybody wants to believe that or not. But anyway, that's beside the point— they actually were attacking him; the guy he shot in the arm pulled a gun on him. One guy hit him over the head with a skateboard or something, too.

Yeah, that was all after the kid had already shot someone in the head. He had already killed someone at this point. I would hit him over the head with a skateboard too, that's terrifying.

I was looking at a bunch of different news sources with a bunch of different biases. (We love the media.)

He was 17 and wasn't even supposed to have a gun or be there. He should have let the police and the people with training do their jobs.

I've looked at a bunch of different news sources too. I generally do, and then get annoyed at how each narrative is spun differently and how nobody actually knows how much of the information being presented to us is true.

"He should have let the police and the people with training do their jobs." Yes, good point, except that in many cases, the police haven't been able to keep a lot of "protesters" under control. Don't get me wrong; I support the police to a good extent and all, they have done a lot to prevent things from getting more out of hand than they already have, and I don't think a 17 year old should've been out there with a gun. That was a really dumb decision on his part, and a dangerous one. At the same time, there have been a lot of protesters (I'm not talking this particular protest, but just… in general) who have destroyed property and killed people. A lot of people. I've seen some really horrible videos of lots of people getting beat to death, and we know a crap ton of business have been demolished. A lot of the people responsible have been bailed out of jail.

All that to say, you have to actually consider the POV of all of the people involved in an open minded way. Be ready to convict them if need be, but be ready to understand their side of the story too. Why were they here? What was their initial intent? Nobody is the bad guy in their own eyes. I'm not saying Kyle is a purely innocent being, 'cause he's not, but I don't think they should be charging him as hard as they currently are.

Some random dude got a bunch of video clips and did commentary off them. Took me an extra sec to find bc FB is deleting stuff like usual.

𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐈'𝐦 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐚 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞 𝐬𝐮𝐦𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐑𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬. 𝐈𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐚𝐥𝐬𝐨 𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐳𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐛𝐞 𝐮𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐟 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐬. 𝐌𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐛𝐨𝐥𝐝. 𝐌𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐧𝐝.

1. Rittenhouse shows up with a rifle to protect gas stations or whatever. He’s on video talking about how they’ll use lethal force because they assume that’s what the protesters are gonna do.

𝐌𝐢𝐬𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠. 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐬𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐚 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐝𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐤𝐢𝐭. 𝐇𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐡𝐢𝐦𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟. 𝐈𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐞𝐲𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐡𝐞'𝐬 𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐬 𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐝 𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐧'𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐥 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞. 𝐈𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐚𝐲 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐬𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐚𝐲 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐰𝐞𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐥.

https://youtu.be/OvPSrTtWo-E - pepper spray

https://twitter.com/i/status/1299051349821325318 - purpose

1. Him and his crew start pointing guns at and taunting protesters.

𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐮𝐧𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐧. 𝐈𝐧 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨𝐬 𝐈’𝐯𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐧, 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐚 𝐠𝐮𝐲𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐠𝐮𝐧𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐤𝐞𝐞𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐛𝐨𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐚𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧/𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐚 𝐠𝐮𝐲𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐞. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝐚 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐚 𝐠𝐮𝐲 𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐝𝐨𝐧’𝐭 𝐚𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐭 “𝐛𝐮𝐥𝐥𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐭”. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐚 𝐠𝐮𝐲 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐧𝐨 𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐥 𝐛𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫.

𝐈𝐧 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐠𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐥𝐬𝐨 𝐩𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐲𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 (𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐝 𝐠𝐮𝐲 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 "𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐭 𝐦𝐞 𝐧** 𝐭𝐨 𝐚 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐚 𝐠𝐮𝐲). 𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐈 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐧'𝐭 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐫 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐚 𝐠𝐮𝐲𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐠𝐮𝐧 𝐚𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐲. 𝐈 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐧’𝐭 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐰𝐡𝐨 “𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐝” 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐠𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1298506102049591296 - BLM / Militia solidarity
https://twitter.com/i/status/1298566712179204096 - BLM / Militia tensions
https://twitter.com/Julio_Rosas11/status/1298474730966659072 - BLM / Militia tensions
https://twitter.com/Julio_Rosas11/status/1298475135297519616 - Militia pleading with rioters to not destroy city

𝐔𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝟖.𝟐𝟖.𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟎 𝟏:𝟐𝟏𝐩𝐦

🚨 𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐀𝐝𝐝𝐞𝐝 🚨

𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐟𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐁𝐋𝐌 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚 𝐠𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧.

𝐉𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐩𝐡 𝐑𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐛𝐚𝐮𝐦, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐲 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐑𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐮𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐢𝐦 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧 𝐨𝐛𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐢𝐦, 𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐚𝐫𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚 𝐥𝐢𝐭 𝐝𝐮𝐦𝐩𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞. 𝐀 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐩𝐮𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐮𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐨 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐉𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐩𝐡 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐛𝐲 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠: "𝐅*** 𝐲𝐨𝐮. 𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐭'𝐬 𝐛𝐮𝐥𝐥𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐭. 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐝𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭?"

https://twitter.com/i/status/1299058504813035520 (Don't click. Copy/paste to browser).

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐩𝐮𝐬𝐡 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐨𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐚 𝐠𝐮𝐲𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐮𝐩 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐤𝐞𝐞𝐩 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐰𝐞𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧. 𝐑𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐛𝐚𝐮𝐦 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐠𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬.

https://twitter.com/livesmatte…/status/1299054948043259912 (Don't click. Copy/paste to browser).

🚨New footage of Kyle running with fire extinguisher (presumably to put out a fire). Putting out fires is reportedly what caused rioters like Joseph Rosenbaum to turn on the militia.

1. Some dude chases him with a flaming bag or something as a result of (2). It’s not a Molotov cocktail; it’s got no weight to it, and it doesn’t burst.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐞𝐬𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐫 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐲. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭𝐬 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐰𝐞𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐞𝐰 𝐘𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬. 𝐈𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨, 𝐢𝐭’𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐠𝐮𝐧 (𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞). 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭, 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐨𝐫 𝐚 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐚𝐭 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞, 𝐨𝐫 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐫 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐢𝐦.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 “𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐝𝐮𝐝𝐞” 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧 𝐨𝐛𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐢𝐦 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭. 𝐈𝐭'𝐬 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐛𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐞𝐭𝐜 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐢𝐭 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞. 𝐈𝐭'𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫. 𝐈 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐥𝐲 𝐝𝐨𝐮𝐛𝐭 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐭𝐲 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐛𝐚𝐠 (𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐬𝐨 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐩𝐢𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐚 𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐥𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐰 𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐭𝐲 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐛𝐚𝐠 𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐢𝐦?). 𝐈𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞, 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐮𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐬. 𝐇𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭. 𝐂𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐲, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐥𝐨𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐠𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐧.

𝐌𝐲 𝐠𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐚𝐬 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞, 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐭 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐛𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐢𝐦, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐠𝐮𝐧 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭𝐬, 𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐡𝐢𝐦. 𝐇𝐞 𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐧 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐮𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐢𝐦.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1298496122135158785 - dealership rioting
https://twitter.com/i/status/1298513645203337216 - dealership rioting
https://twitter.com/trbrtc/status/1298840777251008512 - first shot not kyle. Don't click link. Copy paste to browser.

🚨 𝐌𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐭𝐨𝐯 𝐔𝐩𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐞 🚨 𝟖.𝟐𝟖.𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟎 𝟐:𝟎𝟎𝐩𝐦

𝐈𝐭 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐚 𝐯𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐚 𝐦𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐭𝐨𝐯. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐥𝐝 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐛𝐨𝐦𝐛 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐚 "𝐥𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐡 𝐛𝐨𝐦𝐛 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐫𝐲". 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐥 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐚 "𝐝𝐮𝐝". 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐣𝐮𝐫𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐚𝐠. 𝐌𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐭𝐨𝐯 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧.

1. He gets away, then turns around and shoots the dude from about 20 feet back, hitting him once after firing what sounds like six to ten rounds.

𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐟𝐥𝐞𝐞 𝐢𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲. 𝐇𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐛𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝟑𝟎 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐚 𝐩𝐡𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐞 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐚𝐬 𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐭𝐨 “𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞” 𝐛𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 𝐫𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠.

1. Protesters chase him. After tripping on his own feet and being subsequently kicked by a first protester, a second protester carrying a skateboard rushes forward and tries to strip the rifle from Rittenhouse, but isn't successful.

𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐝𝐨 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐬𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐡𝐢𝐦. 𝐈𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐡𝐢𝐦 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭 𝐚 𝐦𝐨𝐛 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞. 𝐇𝐞 is 𝐡𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐫𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐟𝐥𝐞𝐞. 𝐇𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬. 𝐇𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐤𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐝. 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐚 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐤𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐢𝐦 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐚 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚 𝐬𝐤𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐛𝐨𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐫𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐢𝐦 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐛𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐢𝐦 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐢𝐭. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐛𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐢𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐝, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐧. 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐮𝐩 𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐢𝐦 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐢𝐦.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1298842098163216384 (Don't click link. Copy/paste to browser)

1. As the second protester flees, Rittenhouse shoots him in the back.

𝐇𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐧’𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐭 𝐡𝐢𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤, 𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐡𝐢𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐜𝐡. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐤𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐛𝐨𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐭𝐫𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐟𝐥𝐞𝐞. 𝐇𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐫𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐧. 𝐇𝐞 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐚𝐬 𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐠𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐥 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐮𝐧.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1298501872534388748 (Don't click link. Copy/paste to browser)

1. A third protester, a paramedic approaching to aid what he thought was an injured person laying in the street (Rittenhouse) suddenly finds Rittenhouse shooting the second protester, then turning and aiming his gun at him as the first protester collapsed out of frame.

𝐍𝐨𝐭 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐫𝐝 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐦 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐬 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚 𝐝𝐫𝐚𝐰𝐧 𝐰𝐞𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐥𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐢𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐝. 𝐇𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐧’𝐭 𝐩𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐞𝐝𝐥𝐲 “𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝” 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐫. 𝐇𝐞 𝐫𝐚𝐧 𝐮𝐩 𝐨𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐦 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐞𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐧 𝐝𝐫𝐚𝐰𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐭 𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐢𝐦. 𝐒𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝, 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐦.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1298842098163216384 (Don't click link. Copy/paste to browser)

1. As the 26 year old second protester that initially tried to disarm Rittenhouse dies in the street, the paramedic draws a handgun to defend himself from Rittenhouse.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1298842098163216384 (Don't click link. Copy/paste to browser)

𝐖𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐠𝐮𝐧 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐥𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐝𝐫𝐚𝐰𝐧 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐫𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐊𝐲𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐢𝐭.

𝐈𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧:

𝐖𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐟𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐬 𝐦𝐮𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫. 𝐈𝐧 𝐦𝐲 𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰, 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐰𝐞'𝐯𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐬𝐨 𝐟𝐚𝐫 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐦𝐮𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟-𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬.

𝐇𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐚 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐨𝐰𝐧𝐞𝐫'𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐲, 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐢𝐟 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐰𝐧. 𝐇𝐞 𝐝𝐢𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭𝐬. 𝐈𝐧 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨, 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐥𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭, 𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠. 𝐁𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐛𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐮𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐝.

𝐈𝐭'𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐠𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐫 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐦𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐲. 𝐈𝐟 𝐨𝐫 𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 surface, 𝐚 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟 𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞.

Shooty boy Kyle probably has no good reason to be holding that gun, but beyond that he seems clean.

Shooty boy Kyle probably has no good reason to be holding that gun, but beyond that he seems clean.

I agree 100%