forum The nity Grity debate section
Started by @Consider-PB_and_the_Jellies
tune

people_alt 52 followers

Deleted user

Because I believe it isn't a child.
Child pornography is pornography of anyone under 18.
So if you don't "view it that way," then clearly you should reevaluate whether or not you believe an embryo is a child.

Deleted user

FBI, open up!

Jessica, did you SLEEP with your GODDAMN TEACHER

@Pickles group

Because I believe it isn't a child.
Child pornography is pornography of anyone under 18.
So if you don't "view it that way," then clearly you should reevaluate whether or not you believe an embryo is a child.

So you're trying to guilt trip us for something you did? I– I'll let Dom deal with that when he gets back. This is so dumb.

Deleted user

Because I believe it isn't a child.
Child pornography is pornography of anyone under 18.
So if you don't "view it that way," then clearly you should reevaluate whether or not you believe an embryo is a child.

So you're trying to guilt trip us for something you did? I– I'll let Dom deal with that when he gets back. This is so dumb.

No, I'm not. I'm just proving a point.

@The-N-U-T-Cracker

I’m feeling better and am very boredom so I decided to come back for now
I might’ve missed a page, I don’t actually know, so if I repeat things I’m very sorry-

@The-N-U-T-Cracker

The point of this is not to shame you. It's to prove a point.

…what point?
Are you trying to prove it isn’t a human child by posting a picture of the child and then accusing us of looking at child porn???
That doesn’t prove anything
At all
And also not all nudity is porn
Are we going to boycott mommy bloggers for posting pictures of their children censored only by the puppy they were carrying around?

Deleted user

…what point?

That an embryo is not a child.

Are you trying to prove it isn’t a human child by posting a picture of the child and then accusing us of looking at child porn???

No, I'm saying that if you consider an embryo a child, then you should also consider pictures of embryos child pornography.

That doesn’t prove anything
At all
And also not all nudity is porn

Unless you are considering that embryo at all clothed, then….

Are we going to boycott mommy bloggers for posting pictures of their children censored only by the puppy they were carrying around?

Nope, because those are censored.

Deleted user

Yeah, I changed the picture lmao. This one is closer up, so I found it more fascinating.

@The-N-U-T-Cracker

Unless you are considering that embryo at all clothed, then….

…So nudity = porn
no exceptions
not even in a medical context
sure
got it
guess i'm a porn artist for all those sketches i never finished

Nope, because those are censored.

…Not all of them have puppies…

Deleted user

Figure sketching = porn, Ella, I thought that was agreed upon

Deleted user

Figure sketching = porn, Ella, I thought that was agreed upon

Yeah, clothes first, body later.

This made me ugly laugh, stop this nonsense

Deleted user

This post is way blown out of proportion. I'll delete it.

@Pickles group

Figure sketching = porn, Ella, I thought that was agreed upon

Yeah, clothes first, body later.

This made me ugly laugh, stop this nonsense

^^^

@Althalosian-is-the-father book

Because I believe it isn't a child.
Child pornography is pornography of anyone under 18.
So if you don't "view it that way," then clearly you should reevaluate whether or not you believe an embryo is a child.

So you're trying to guilt trip us for something you did? I– I'll let Dom deal with that when he gets back. This is so dumb.

Wait. What happened??

Deleted user

I posted something that was a bit ignorant and blown out of proportion v quickly